The Russia scandal may have been the biggest happening of 2017 so far. Still, although plenty of effort was put into this investigation, the outcome has come fruitless each and every time.
Nonetheless, the infamous DNC hacking has been widely discussed, and a new report by Patrick Lawrence of The Nation just broke, revealing more than ever before.
The report was helped by numerous forensic experts and ex-national security intelligence officers, who looked into the hack.
And as much as the liberals like to call it a hack, truth of the matter is- it wasn’t. As it turns out, the DNC intel was purposely released, after being transferred to a hard disk.
Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists all worked long hours to negate the DNC’s initial story of the ‘hack’ due to serious lack of evidence.
They managed to find that aside from the fact there was no clear evidence of the hack, there certainly was a leak, who downloaded the documents on a memory key.
This indicates a deliberate breach in order to prove something to America.
Another thing found in time of the analysis was that the timing of the download was too coincidental to be just a hack. This means that an insider must have had or allowed access to someone who could get the job done in a short time frame. On July 5, 2016, 1,976 MB of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server.
The entire process took only 87 seconds. Do the math- this is basically 22.7 megabytes per second.
With the use of standard internet, this task would be impossible to carry out.
Here is how the experts explain it:
“A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unobtainable, especially if we are talking about a transoceanic data transfer,” Folden said. “Based on the data we now have, what we’ve been calling a hack is impossible.” Last week Forensicator reported on a speed test he conducted more recently. It tightens the case considerably. “Transfer rates of 23 MB/s (Mega Bytes per second) are not just highly unlikely, but effectively impossible to accomplish when communicating over the Internet at any significant distance,” he wrote. “Further, local copy speeds are measured, demonstrating that 23 MB/s is a typical transfer rate when using a USB–2 flash device (thumb drive).”
Whoever stood behind the entire operation was acting from the East Coast, as opposed to Europe.
The stamps that recorded the download are associated with Eastern Daylight Time Zone at approximately 6:45 pm.
The best guess would be a person working from Bangor or Miami. The story of a download happening from Russia or Europe is simply ridiculous. The way the data was handled and used, also points to an inside job.
Russia was apparently burdened with the guilt of performing the hack on purpose.
This is explained in depth by Guccifer 2.0 and his metadata and analysis of the hack. So, any trail that led to Russia is fabricated to make it look like America’s sworn enemies are behind the entire operation.
“It’s clear,” another forensics investigator self-identified as HET, wrote in a report on this question, “that metadata was deliberately altered and documents were deliberately pasted into a Russianified [W]ord document with Russian language settings and style headings.”
A CIA’s asset, called Vault 7, contains a so-called Marble component, able to fabricate documents and leave ‘fingerprints’ wherever it wants.
After the DNC was hacked, no branch such as the FBI and others were allowed to come near the source of the crime. This means that DNC’s computers were left intact, while a firm called Crowdstrike, that deals with resolving conflicts of this sort, handled the issue.
The co-founder of the firm, Dmitri Alperovitch, who is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, has been labeled as strictly anti-Russian.
“We continue to stand by our report,” CrowdStrike said, upon seeing the VIPS blueprint of the investigation. CrowdStrike argues that by July 5 all malware had been removed from the DNC’s computers. But the presence or absence of malware by that time is entirely immaterial, because the event of July 5 is proven to have been a leak and not a hack. Given that malware has nothing to do with leaks, CrowdStrike’s logic appears to be circular.
All intelligence collected from the case shows this was not a Russian conspiracy.
The laws of physics don’t lie,” Ray McGovern volunteered at one point. “It’s QED, theorem demonstrated,” William Binney said. “There’s no evidence out there to get me to change my mind.” When I asked Edward Loomis, a 90 percent man, about the 10 percent he held out, he replied, “I’ve looked at the work and it shows there was no Russian hack. But I didn’t do the work. That’s the 10 percent. I’m a scientist.”
Should the truth come out is fairly uncertain, but getting one step closer to it, is certainly worthy of our attention at least.