Rep. Debbie Dingell to Introduce Gun Confiscation Legislation
Connect with us

News

Rep. Debbie Dingell to Introduce Gun Confiscation Legislation

Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) used an April 2 Fox News Live appearance to announce that she is preparing to introduce legislation to create a federal law allowing firearm confiscation orders.

Such laws, generally referred to as Extreme Risk Protection Orders, are already in place in California, Indiana, Oregon, and other states, and Dingell believes the ability to seize firearms is crucial for pubic safety.

During live broadcast Dingell said, “Rep. Fred Upton (R) and I are looking at introducing … legislation … at the national level.” She added, “I grew up in a home where a man shouldn’t have had access to a gun, and I remember some very frightening moments, and there was ability to deal with it. A family who knows that someone in their family could be a danger to themselves or to others needs to have tool that they can take that gun away.”

Dingell stressed that seizure of firearms must occur in a way that protects due process, but she did not explain how such protection is possible. In California an order to take guns can be issued without the gun owner even knowing. And in Indiana, the state on which Dingell is basing her federal legislation, individuals who have their guns seized have approximately 14 days to go to court to “make a case” to get them back.

The Salt Lake Tribune summed up the Indiana law, “In Indiana, law enforcement can confiscate weapons without a judge’s order. The gun owner must ask the court to get the weapons returned.”

Extreme Risk Protection Orders have proved a popular gun control response to the February 14 Parkland school shooting. However, it is difficult to believe such orders would have prevented that attack. On February 23, 2018, Breitbart News reported, “The family with which [Cruz] was staying repeatedly called the police on him in November 2017 but refused to file charges when sheriff’s deputies arrived. A member of the family with which Cruz was staying explained away Cruz’s erratic behavior by saying he ‘had been suffering significantly from the loss of his mother’ earlier in the month.”

In other words, Nikolas Cruz received sympathy from the family with which he lived and at least one member of that family, in turn, inclined police toward non-action as well.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Frank McLeod

    April 3, 2018 at 11:06 am

    This is extreme government overreach and will not be tolerated.

  2. Robert Reilly

    April 3, 2018 at 11:23 am

    You can pass all the gun confiscation laws you want but it can not deter a bad person or anyone who should not own a gun from getting a gun! The person in your own household with mental issues who could do harm to others should have been committed. Thanks to the left, the ACLU closed the Mental illness asylums creating massive numbers of homeless and creating school shootings. We have always had guns but NEVER mass school shootings until after the aclu closed the asylums. Do some research! No one can tell me that the shooters did not have mental problems that was know to others!

  3. Tana Bouquet

    April 3, 2018 at 1:10 pm

    This Debbie, is just another puppet on a string. I know it is true, because common sense ,if you are not brainwashed, tells you that this is ridiculous! Introducing gun confiscation legislation???? Really!!! Hilarious,and at same time, very DISTURBING!!!!!!!!
    As a nation, we have some deep cleansing to do. Do you want someone like her to represent you??????

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CF